Process Consultation in Improving the Effectiveness of Regional Police Competent Sub-Division Groups: A Qualitative Study

Authors

  • Alifia Ainun Rizky Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Arsianita Nur Fattah Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26858/brain.v3i1.60

Keywords:

process consultation, group effectiveness, group functioning, organizational diagnosis, Regional Police

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the Competency Sub-Division (Subbagkompeten) group at the Human Resources Bureau (Ro SDM) of the X Regional Police using a qualitative approach with the group-level diagnostic model from Cummings and Worley (2015). The study aims to describe the dynamics of group effectiveness in terms of input, goal clarity, task structure, group composition, group functioning, and work norms, and to design appropriate interventions. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with six participants (one sub-division head, one affairs officer, and four administrative non-commissioned officers), supported by observations, questionnaires, and document studies from September to December 2022. Data analysis was conducted using verbatim and stream analysis approaches. The results show that the overall effectiveness of the Sub-Division is in the high category, but there are significant problems in the group functioning component, particularly related to the lack of personal initiative in decision-making and dependence on external communication on a single personnel. These findings cause obstacles to achieving group output. Based on the diagnostic results, this study recommends process consultation intervention as an appropriate approach to improve communication, interpersonal relationships, and overall group effectiveness. This research provides a practical contribution to police organizations in managing human resources at the work group level

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asih, W. (2017). Improving human resource performance through learning initiatives and orientations, as well as adaptability.ECOBIS, 18(1), 96–105.

Azwar, S. (2016). Research methodsStudent Library.

Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2015). Organization Development & Change (10th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.

Daryanto. (2013).Effective Learning Innovation. Yrma Widya.

Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 315–342). Prentice-Hall.

Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2015). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. Harvard Business Review Press.

Ondi, E. O., Annisa, V., & Periantalo, J. (2022). Content validity test of the consultation process intervention module to improve effective communication between superiors and subordinates in the consumer service unit at PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia Witel Jambi.Jambi Journal of Psychology, 7(2), 23–31.

Prawiyogi, A. G., Sadiah, T. L., Purwanugraha, A., & Elisa, P. N. (2021). The use of big book media to foster students' interest in reading in elementary schools.Basicedu Journal, 5(1), 446–452.

Robbins, S. P. (2015). Organizational Behavior. Salemba Empat.

Schein, E. H. (1999).Process Consultation Revisited: Building the Helping Relationship. Addison-Wesley.

Sugiyono. (2017).Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Alphabet.

Tampubolon, M. P. (2020). Change Management: Change Management — Individuals, Work Teams, Organizations. Media Discourse Partners.

Wandi, D., Adha, S., & Asriyah, I. (2019). The influence of communication on employee performance at the Banten provincial regional disaster management agency.Journal of Vocational Economics, 2(2), 18–30.

Yusra, Z., Zulkarnain, R. Z., & Sofino. (2021). LKP Management during the Covid-19 pandemic.Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4(1), 15–22.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-11

How to Cite

Alifia Ainun Rizky, & Arsianita Nur Fattah. (2026). Process Consultation in Improving the Effectiveness of Regional Police Competent Sub-Division Groups: A Qualitative Study. Business Research and Administration Innovation, 3(1), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.26858/brain.v3i1.60